Berlin v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,
The question here involved is whether an infant can maintain an action for injuries sustained while en ventre sa mere. The court below held that he could not.
This question has never been presented to an appellate court in Pennsylvania. The courts of review of other states have consistently held that such an action cannot be maintained: Drobner v. Peters, 232 N. Y. 220, 133 N. E. 567; Dietrich v. Northampton, 138 Mass. 14, 52 Am. Rep. 242; Ryan v. P. S. C. T., 18 N. J. Misc. 429, 14 A. (2) 52; Allaire v. St. Luke’s Hosp., 184 Ill. 359, 56 N. E. 638.
At early…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Allaire v. St. Luke's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Drobner v. . PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by29 opinions
- Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Bonbrest v. KotzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.