Kracht v. Aalfs Associates H.C.P.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.607
II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.608
III. FINDINGS OF FACT. Oí O
A. Undisputed Facts. O O
B. Disputed Facts. Oi H-i
IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS. vH
A. Standard Of Review. tH
B. Pre-existing Condition Analysis. CO
C. Pre-Certification For Kracht’s Surgery t~~
V.CONCLUSION.618
This litigation raises a troublesome issue in which forty-eight hours determines whether Plaintiff or his former employer’s health care plan must pay more than $50,000 in…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bruns v. HalfordDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Bonilla v. Principal Financial GroupDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Lawson v. Fortis InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- FUTAMURA ESTATE OF FUTAMURA v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2004