Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Fortis Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2001No. CIV.A. 00-6538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KATZ, Senior District Judge.

This case concerns a preexisting condition exclusion contained in a short-term medical insurance policy issued by defendant Fortis Insurance Company and purchased by plaintiff Joseph Lawson for himself and his daughter Elena Lawson. Plaintiffs bring claims for breach of contract and bad faith. Now before the court are the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. Background

Mr. Lawson obtained the Fortis policy for himself and Elena on October 7, 1998, and the policy became effective two days…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph Lawson Tammy Malatak, on Behalf of Minor Child Elena Lawson v. Fortis Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Lawson v. Fortis Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API