Legal Opinion
Professional Beauty Products, Inc. v. Schmid
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 27, 1973No. 6333PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from the denial of temporary injunctions sought in two cases which were consolidated for the purposes of this hearing. The Appellant, Professional Beauty Products, Inc., sought to enjoin its two former employees, Karl H. Schmid and L. T. Derington, from violating the terms of their written contracts of employment which provided that they were not to compete with the employer for a period of one year after termination in certain areas. We reverse the judgment denying the temporary injunctions and remand with instructions.
For some ten years, Professional…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Manning v. WieserTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Costello v. Hillcrest State Bank of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- McLean v. Employers Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Custom Drapery Co., Inc. v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Chapman Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Franks, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Arevalo v. Velvet Door, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Professional Beauty Products, Inc. v. DeringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.