Legal Opinion
Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 1978No. 2-376A92PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company (Panhandle) filed suit against Leland and Fannie S. Rees (hereinafter referred to as Rees) seeking injunctive relief. After a hearing, the trial court entered an interlocutory order granting a preliminary injunction from which Rees appeals.
Panhandle possesses right-of-way easements for the operation and maintenance of four (4) underground natural gas pipelines across 15.10 acres of wooded tract owned by Rees. These lines are referred to as the G-100, G-200, G-300 and G-400 lines. The G-400 line was created in a prior condemnation action which expressly…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, a Non-Profit Corporation v. Island Creek Coal Company, a Corporation, and Frederick DorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Indiana State Department of Welfare v. StagnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Harvest Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Inter-Ocean Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Common Council of Peru v. Peru Daily Tribune, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.