Legal Opinion

J.Q. v. D.R.L.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1988No. 64S03-8807-JV-607PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CIVIL PETITION TO TRANSFER

DICKSON, Justice.

The power of state courts to conduct adoption proceedings involving children of Indian ancestry may be subject to significant limitations under the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963 (1982). The central issue in this case is whether a state adoption proceeding was proper and valid under the ICWA.

T.R.M. (“the child”) was bom on June 14, 1981, in Hot Springs, South Dakota. Her biological mother is J.Q. Her paternity has not been established. In the summer of 1974, J.Q. met D.R.L. and E.M.L. (“adoptive parents”) when the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. South Carolina v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy DSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. In re M.E.M. Youth in Need of CareMontana Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of TRMIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Comanche Indian Tribe of Oklahoma v. HovisDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  3. J.C. v. J.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Arturo G.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Rosalind M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's Services and Ingrid A. (Mother) and Togiak Traditional CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API