Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Arturo G.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Introduction
The trial court, feeling compelled by the Indian Child Welfare Act, ordered the minor in this dependency case removed from the home of the only parents the minor knows, and transferred to a home on a Chippewa Indian reservation in Minnesota. We apply the “existing Indian family doctrine” to reverse the trial court’s placement order.
*1279Summary
In a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26,1 the trial court terminated parental rights and, under authority of the Indian Child Welfare Act (the ICWA or the Act) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.), ordered Santos…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.