Legal Opinion · Concurrence

J.C. v. J.C.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2010No. 49A02-0909-CV-862Published

1ConcurrenceBarnes, Judge

Although I concur with the majority opinion, I write separately to note Indiana's minority position in applying the *608"existing Indian family" doctrine. The ICWA was enacted in 1978 to:

protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimum Federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing for assistance to Indian tribes in the operation of child…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Adoption of Baby Boy L.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy DSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. In the Matter of Baby Boy L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. In re A.J.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. J.Q. v. D.R.L.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API