Legal Opinion

Helix Electric, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 10, 2005No. 02-478CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This dispute arises under a contract for the replacement of the electrical distribution system at Keesler Air Force Base (AFB) in Biloxi, Mississippi (the Contract). Plaintiff claims that the Contract gave it the right to become a cable television operator on base and that the Navy breached its implied duty to cooperate and not to hinder this aspect of Plaintiffs performance.

At issue is Section 6.2 of the Contract, which states, “[t]he Contractor must pay Cable One to relocate their [sic] [CATV] system or acquire service…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jay Cashman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Couture Hotel Corporate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API