Helix Electric, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This dispute arises under a contract for the replacement of the electrical distribution system at Keesler Air Force Base (AFB) in Biloxi, Mississippi (the Contract). Plaintiff claims that the Contract gave it the right to become a cable television operator on base and that the Navy breached its implied duty to cooperate and not to hinder this aspect of Plaintiffs performance.
At issue is Section 6.2 of the Contract, which states, “[t]he Contractor must pay Cable One to relocate their [sic] [CATV] system or acquire service…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jay Cashman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Couture Hotel Corporate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.