Legal Opinion
Urbano v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 30, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-68. Court No. 95-12-01721PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff John V. Urbano’s (“plaintiff’ or “Urbano”) Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56.1. Plaintiff argues he was wrongfully deprived of his license as a United States Customs broker which was revoked pursuant to a hearing in 1994. Plaintiff maintains the commencement of formal revocation proceedings was barred by the five-year statute of limitations contained in 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(2) (1988). Plaintiff additionally argues the revocation hearing was tainted. Plaintiff also moves for Oral Argument pursuant to U.S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Barnhart v. United States Treasury DepartmentUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Tempo Trucking and Transfer Corp. v. DicksonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Barnhart v. United States Treasury DepartmentUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. RicciUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Saarstahl Ag v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Shiepe v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- John v. Urbano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. RicciUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997