Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Twyman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2001No. 68655-6PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

Jerry Twyman, Donald Vangeystel and Taye Yirdaw were each convicted of criminal offenses in the Shoreline Division of the King County District Court, before juries drawn from pools selected from an area, consisting of three King County zip codes, generally coextensive with the Shoreline Division’s electoral district. Arguing that the *118state constitution requires that jury pools be selected from King County as a whole, all three appealed to King County Superior Court where each case was affirmed. The Court of Appeals, Division One, granted discretionary review and affirmed the consolidated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. TingdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Murphy v. Superior Court for Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Bothell v. BarnhartWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. LancilotiWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. NemitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. NemitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. LancilotiWashington Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API