Legal Opinion
State v. Nemitz
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 13, 2001No. 18680-6-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
19 P.3d 480 (2001)
105 Wash.App. 205
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Keith A. NEMITZ, Petitioner.
No. 18680-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
March 13, 2001.
Douglas D. Phelps and Scott R. Staab, Phelps & Associates, Spokane, for petitioner.
Patrick T. Johnson, Jr. and Brian C. O'Brien, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, for respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
This driving under the influence (DUI) case presents two issues. First, did the district court violate Keith Nemitz's constitutional right to a representative jury by refusing to provide an interpreter for a Vietnamese prospective…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.