State v. Lanciloti
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
¶1 — Our constitution guarantees “an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed” in all “criminal prosecutions.” Const. art. I, § 22. The primary question before us today is whether the legislature violated this guaranty when it allowed King County to divide itself into two superior court jury districts. We conclude that the legislature had the plenary power to enact this legislation, affirm the superior court, and remand.
*664Background
¶2 King County holds superior court in two locations: the King County courthouse in Seattle and the Norm Maleng Regional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Heinsma v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Heinsma v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Department of Social & Health Services v. LuakWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Bothell v. BarnhartWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. YishmaelWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. LancilotiWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.