Legal Opinion
Silvio v. Ford Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 2003No. B157741PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
This case raises a single question concerning Civil Code section 1793.2, subdivision (d), part of the Song-Beverly Consumer *1207Warranty Act. The statute sets forth the remedies to be afforded to consumers by any automobile manufacturer which “is unable to service or repair a new motor vehicle ... to conform to the applicable express warranties after a reasonable number of attempts, . . .” (Civ. Code, § 1793.2, subd. (d)(2).) In this case, appellants Frank M. and Charlotte Silvio gave respondents Ford Motor Company and Board Ford one chance to repair their allegedly defective…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Trailers of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Neilson v. City of California CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- D.L. Edmonson Selective Service Inc. v. LCW Automotive Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.