Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Bernstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

The administratrix of the estate of Michael Nathan, deceased, sues in equity for a money judgment against the defendant bank and for an equitable decree against the defendant Bernstein that she has no right, title or interest in the savings bank account, the proceeds of which the administratrix is attempting to reach. The deceased had opened a bank account with the defendant bank in his own name in trust for Dora Bernstein and had retained the bank book in his own possession. The complaint states:

“ That sometime prior to his death, said Michael Nathan declared and stated that it was his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pouch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Ehrich v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Brown v. Arbogast & Bastian Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Wenstrom Electric Co. v. BloomerNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casolaro v. BlauNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rudic v. ConstanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API