Legal Opinion

Rudic v. Constante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for conversion and unjust enrichment, the- defendants *548Greenpoint Savings Bank and Cullen and Dykman appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered April 24, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that numerous issues of fact precluded summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Shapiro v. McNeillNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Nathan v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API