Legal Opinion

Wenstrom Electric Co. v. Bloomer

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the Wenstrom Electric Company against Charles H. Bloomer and others. From an order continuing a temporary injunction, defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The defendants Charles H. Bloomer, Walter C. Bloomer, and Nathan Bushnell were electrical contractors doing business under the firm name of Bloomer Bros. & Co.; and on the 28th of February, 1894, they entered into a contract with one William Noble, who was then engaged in erecting the Hotel Empire in the city of New York, for the construction and erection by them of an electric light plant in said hotel, the terms of payment to be 85. per cent, of the value of the work done and materials furnished each month as the work progressed, the final payment to be made, on the completion of the work,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crane v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Schell v. LoweNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Arbogast & Bastian Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Nathan v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. B. Altman & Co. v. ComstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API