The Bound Brook
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Admiralty. On plea to jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE, District Judge.
In this libel for wages the libelants allege that they signed articles on July 18, 1905, at New Orleans, where the steamer then was, for a trip to Jamaica and back to Boston as seamen and .firemen on board her, at certain rates of wages; that they went on board on July 19th, have performed their duties during the trip, and that certain sums are now due them, payment of which has been refused.
The steamer, as below appears, is a German vessel.- The libelants allege that they signed the articles before the German Consul at New Orleans. Her owner and claimant, a German…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Whitney v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- The Chinese Exclusion CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Tellefsen v. FeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Diomede v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Seneca Washed Gravel Corporation v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.