Legal Opinion
Brannan v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1958No. 37,404PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Two actions were involved here. One action was to recover money damages for personal injuries sustained on July 12, 1955, by plaintiff, Charles C. Brannan, allegedly as a result of the negligence of defendant, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, and of the unseaworthy condition of the dredge Mogul, of which defendant was the owner and upon which defendant employed plaintiff. The other action was to recover damages for maintenance and cure for the period of plaintiff’s disability resulting from the injuries. The cases were tried together, and at the close of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barrios v. Louisiana Construction Materials Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Rudolph E. Hill v. B.F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company, John Gence Hodges v. B. F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Brinegar v. San Ore Construction CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1969
- Arundel Corp. v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Barrios v. Louisiana Construction Materials CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972