Legal Opinion
People v. Blankenship
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 2005No. 03CA0665PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
Defendant, Kevin L. Blankenship, appeals the trial court order denying his postconvietion motion under Crim. P. 35(c). We affirm.
I. Background
Defendant, a juvenile who ran away from his home in Illinois, was convicted on jury verdiets in two separate trials for kidnapping, robbery, burglary, and murder of an elderly woman. Following his arrest and after signing a form waiving his Miranda rights, defendant made incriminating statements to the police that were later admitted at trial. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The verdicts were affirmed on an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. EllisColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. DeanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. WentlingColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Blankenship v. EstepCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- People v. WentlingColorado Court of Appeals · 2015