Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Estep

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2009No. 08-1476PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Kevin Blankenship, an inmate appearing pro se, seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Blankenship argues that Colo.Rev.Stat. § 19-2-511(2)(a)(III) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The statute permits the admission of custodial statements made by juvenile out-of-state runatuays if they are “of sufficient age and understanding.” Colo.Rev.Stat. § 19-2-511(2)(a). However, admission of certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. City of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API