Blankenship v. Estep
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Kevin Blankenship, an inmate appearing pro se, seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Blankenship argues that Colo.Rev.Stat. § 19-2-511(2)(a)(III) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The statute permits the admission of custodial statements made by juvenile out-of-state runatuays if they are “of sufficient age and understanding.” Colo.Rev.Stat. § 19-2-511(2)(a). However, admission of certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. City of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018