Legal Opinion

Herman v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 21, 1939No. 7211PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The layman’s sense of grievance is not (and this is axiomatic) coterminous with an invasion of his legal rights. By unfortunate hypothesis then, the aggrieved one must seek enlightenment from specialists skilled in the ascertainment of redressable as opposed to felt wrongs. Their advice, fortunately, is correct more often than not. In the case at bar, however, we feel that they have far exceeded the usual margin of error. The learned district judge was so strongly of our opinion that he granted defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

The plaintiff purchased…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Moffat Tunnel Improvement Dist. v. Denver & S. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. HumphreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hopkins v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Neopart Transit, LLC v. CBM N.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Zahner Ex Rel. Zahner v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. Delaware Institution District v. Middletown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Chatham County Hospital Authority v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API