Legal Opinion
In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 7, 1997No. Civil Action No. 95-4704. MDL No. 1061PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by defendants The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”), Arthur F. Ryan and Donald G. Southwell (together the “individual defendants”) to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint of the putative national class (the “complaint”) in this MDL proceed ing. 1 The parties argued the motion before this Court on April 16, 1996. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
As plaintiffs’ counsel stated at oral argument, the…
2Cases cited112 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dewey v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Benak v. Alliance Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.