Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The facts of the case at bar are reminiscent. The plaintiff-appellant, a Baltimorean, operating as the Camden Products Company (New Jersey), manufactured malt syrup, a primary ingredient in the brewing of beer. The defendantappellee, a brewery, for reasons undisclosed by the record but easily conjecturable by United States Judges, lost its permit for the manufacture of near beer, the then legal kind, 27 U.S.C.A. §§ 4, 58; R. 45. Nothing daunted, it continued the purchase of plaintiff’s malt and in those purchases enjoyed the enthusiastic co-operation of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hoffman v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Gorsuth v. ButterfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Standard Lumber Co. v. Butler Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Nachman Spring-Filled Corporation v. Kay Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- TCA Building Co. v. Northwestern Resources Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.