Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Humphrey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, referred to as insurer, issued a policy insuring Harold Humphrey, referred to as the insured, against accident resulting in disability continuously and wholly disabling him from performing any kind of duty pertaining to the occupation in which he was engaged at the time of the accident. The policy provided for payment of weekly benefits for the period of the disability. The insured was injured December 24, 1929, by an automobile accident in Florida. Insurer paid the weekly benefits until December 18,1930, when a settlement was made and a receipt and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Morgan v. LayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. McIsaac v. McMurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  4. Davis v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. TurnbullMississippi Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Boles v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Stewart v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Pugh's Lawn Landscape Co. v. Jaycon Development Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bowater North America Corp. v. Murray Machinery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Vondera v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API