Legal Opinion
Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shainswit, J.) entered February 17, 1982, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the second, third, fourth, and fifth causes of action of the amended complaint and denying the motion to dismiss the first cause of action, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that the motion to dismiss the first cause of action of the amended complaint is granted, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. On the present state of the law it does not appear that New York recognizes a cause of action for abusive discharge (Edwards v Citibank, 74 AD2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edwards v. CitibankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- State Division of Human Rights v. Westmoreland Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Beckford v. Corning Glass WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Marinzulich v. National Bank of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eva MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Zucker v. KatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Boyce v. New York City Mission SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Rio v. Presbyterian Hosp. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.