Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Misko

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1993No. S-91-396PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the defendant in this action to recover damages for misrepresentation, securities violations, and fraud and deceit. The action was originally filed in the district court for Douglas County, but upon a request for change of venue, the case was tried in the district court for Valley County.

The plaintiffs’ assignments of error combine to assert that the district court erred (1) in failing to rule that defendant, as a matter of law, was a seller or offeror of unregistered securities who is liable to the plaintiffs under Neb. Rev. Stat. §…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Berrier v. BizerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lombardo v. SedlacekNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API