Legal Opinion
State v. Crane
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1915No. 12819PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered March 3, 1915, upon a trial and conviction of accepting the earnings of a prostitute.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.
The defendant has appealed from a conviction on the charge of accepting the earnings of a prostitute. The charging part of the information, to which he unsuccessfully demurred, is as follows:
“He, said Felix Crane, in the county of King, state of Washington, on the 28th day of December, 1914, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously accept the earnings of one Gladys Bates, she, said Gladys Bates, then and there being a common prostitute.”
This information is practically the same as the information in State v. Columbus, 74 Wash. 290, 133 Pac. 455, which we held sufficient, saying:
“…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. ColumbusWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. John Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SchumanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. RandallWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. CashawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- State v. BuckwaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Commonwealth v. ThetoniaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.