State v. Cashaw
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, C.J.
Defendant, after trial by jury, was convicted of violating RCW 9.79.060(5). That statute provides that “Every person who— . . . (5) [s]hall live with or accept any earnings of a common prostitute, . . . [s]hall be punished . .
Motion for a new trial was denied and judgment and sentence were entered. Defendant appeals, newly-appointed counsel having been appointed for him on appeal.
On November 7, 1969, defendant was arrested by Detectives Bartley, Patrick and Richards for suspicion of living with and accepting the earnings of a common prostitute. He was at that time advised of his Miranda…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- People v. FiorittoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. LanningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.