Legal Opinion

Acme Land & Fur Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 14, 1934No. Docket Nos. 50630, 62886Published

1. An award of damage to a landowner engaged in selling trapping land upon which wild animal life has been ruined by inundation due to an artificial crevasse cut by the state under the police power is not exempt from tax as a gift or constitutionally immune because received from a state. 2. Salary deductions disallowed in part by the Commissioner held not established by the evidence to be reasonable.

1Opinion of the Court

ACME LAND & FUR COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Acme Land & Fur Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 50630, 62886.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

31 B.T.A. 582; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1061;

November 14, 1934, Promulgated

1. An award of damage to a landowner engaged in selling trapping land upon which wild animal life has been ruined by inundation due to an artificial crevasse cut by the state under the police power is not exempt from tax as a gift or constitutionally immune because received from a state.

2. Salary deductions disallowed in part by the Commissioner…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API