Legal Opinion

Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of Louisiana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1924No. 65PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Plaintiffs in error are severally engaged in Louisiana in the business of buying, selling, importing, exporting and dealing in hides, skins and furs, some of which come from wild furbearing animals and alligators in .that State. They brought this suit in the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans to enjoin the defendant in error from enforcing the payment of a severance tax levied by Act 135 of the General Assembly of Louisiana, 1920. 1 By that act, all wild furbearing animals and alligators in the State, and their skins, are declared to be the property of the State until the severance…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API