Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Senior & Disabled Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1999No. 0312-AZ0603-1; CA A98932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWolliieim, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the Senior and Disabled Services Division’s (SDSD) denial of her claim for benefits under the spousal pay program (program), ORS 411.803, OAR 411-030-080, arguing the denial violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 USC § 12132 (1998), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 USC § 794 (1998). We affirm.

This petition concerns SDSD’s denial of petitioner’s second application for spousal pay benefits. The program provides:

“When a married recipient of public assistance * * * requires in-home care, * * * [SDSD] shall provide that such care be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Robert E. Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Does 1-5 v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Pottgen v. Missouri State High School Activities Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Easley v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API