Legal Opinion
Does 1-5 v. Chandler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1996No. 95-17245PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERHIGE, Senior District Judge:
This case arises out of a class action lawsuit brought by Appellants, John Does 1-5 and Jane Doe, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. Appellees are Susan M. Chandler, Director of the Hawaii Department of Human Services, and Patricia Murakami, Acting Administrator, Family and Adult Services Division.
HRS § 346-71 is the principal statutory mandate for Hawaii’s General Assistance (“GA”) Program. HRS § 346-71 was amended in 1995 by Act 166 of the Hawaii legislature. Appellants filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harmon E. Welsh v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Robert E. Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.