Legal Opinion
Pate v. Columbia Machine, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 15, 1996No. Civ. No. 94-0145-S-BLWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WINMILL, District Judge.
The Court held a bench trial in this matter that concluded on January 11, 1996. After examining all the testimony and documents admitted into evidence at that trial, the Court enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).
I
FINDINGS OF FACT
A. The S32 Splitter.
1.The S32 Splitter is a machine designed to split concrete blocks.
2. The S32 Splitter was manufactured by Defendant Columbia Machine Inc., and shipped to Pumice Products in June 1976.
3. Columbia is a Washington…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goehring v. TargetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ozzie Lee v. Terex Corporation, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026