Goehring v. Target
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
The district court granted summary-judgment to defendants below, on plaintiffs’ claim that inadequate warnings about odor-fade on propane gas caused injuries to the Goehring family when plaintiff Sam Goehring lit a cigarette in the Goehrings’ tent. Propane gas which no longer had a detectable odor had leaked from a heater inside the tent during the night. When Sam lit a cigarette the next morning a flash-fire ignited. The district court held that Sam Goehring’s failure to read and heed the warnings given was the proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ injuries. The district court held…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Mico Mobile Sales & Leasing, Inc. v. Skyline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Robinson v. Williamsen Idaho Equipment CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Clark v. ChrishopIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beard v. Mighty Lift, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016