Curl v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
Dale Curl (Curl) chose four young children to satiate his sexual desires, isolating his prey prior to each attack. The testimony of his youthful victims was pivotal to jury convictions on two counts of taking immoral or indecent liberties and two counts of second-degree sexual assault. Curl assigns error to the district court’s admission of testimony from corroborative witnesses and claims the State failed to prove one sexual assault. Finding no error in the admission of testimony and sufficient direct evidence, we affirm.
I. ISSUES
Curl states his issues as follows:
Issue I
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.