Legal Opinion
RIVER ROAD WATER DISTRICT v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 14, 1972No. 100704; 100705; 100706PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals are two water districts and a park and recreation district. The city of Eugene, acting under the Local Government Boundary Commissions law, ORS 199.140 et seq, annexed certain territories lying within the boundaries of each of the plaintiffs. It also withdrew from the two water districts the water district territories which it had annexed.
After these actions on the part of the city, each of the three districts held a “remonstrance election” in which a majority voted against the city’s actions. The Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Board of Directors v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- McLain v. LaffertyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Clark v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Petersen v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF KLAMATH FALLSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Peterson v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Urban Renewal Comm. of Oregon City v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022