Foregger v. Foregger

Three issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Did the trial court err in entering duplicitous orders and in retroactively increasing support payments for 1966 and 1967?(2) Did the trial court err in the manner in which it enforced its initial judgment concerning the sale of real estate?(3) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in ordering the defendant’s share of the proceeds of the sale of real estate to be held in trust as a penalty for contempt in failing to keep a $100,000 life insurance policy in force as required by the judgment of divorce?

Appellant objects to that portion of the…