In RE MARRIAGE OF SCHULZ v. Ystad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis J. Ceci, J.
These cases were consolidated in this court for purposes of decision. In each case, a child support arrearage accrued pursuant to an order or judgment for support entered prior to August 1, 1987, and the parent obligated to pay support sought reduction of the arrearage after that date. The cases present a common issue concerning the application of sec. 767.32(lm), Stats., which became effective on August 1, 1987, and provides that the circuit court may not revise the amount of child support due under an order or judg*582ment for support prior to the date that notice of a petition to revise…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Chappy v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Barstad v. FrazierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Brooks v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State v. RamosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Snopek v. LAKELAND MEDICAL CENTERWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Eau Claire County Department of Human Services v. S. E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.