DOCTORS'COMPANY v. Drezga

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

T1 This case comes before us on appeal from a grant of summary judgment by the district court. Appellant, The Doctor's Company (TDC), argues that the district court erred in holding that its malpractice insurance policy could not be invalidated based on the misrepresentations and noneooperation of the insured doctor. Appellant further challenges the district court order that it pay attorney fees for an absent and nonindigent Appellee. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 In 1996, Appellee Dr. Gregory Drezga, an obstetrician-gynecologist, applied to TDC for a medical malpractice…