Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2004No. 2001-SC-0262-DGPublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the

Court by Justice KELLER.

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In June and July, 1995, Appellants, who were employees of a Monticello, Kentucky Wal-Mart, Inc. (‘Wal-Mart”) store, were terminated for “unauthorized removal of company property” and “violation of company policy” — specifically, for eating “claims candy,” i.e., candy from open or torn bags removed from the store’s shelves that had been taken to the store’s “claims area” to be processed by a claims clerk and then either discarded or returned. Appellants filed suit against Wal-Mart and their supervisor, Appellee…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Firestone Textile Co. Division v. MeadowsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Craft v. RiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McCall v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  5. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. HornungKentucky Supreme Court · 1988

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Marla Montell v. Diversified Clinical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Toler v. Süd-Chemie, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Paul Mik, Jr. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. W.J.A. v. D.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  5. In Re: Stanley Lowenbraun, Debtor. Ethel Lowenbraun v. Thomas L. Canary, Jr. And Mapother & Mapother, PscCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API