Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY
Re: Dkt. No. 47
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
Before the Court is a motion, filed by Plaintiffs Alipheom D/B/A Jawbone and Bodymedia, Inc. (“Jawbone”), to stay this action pending'resolution of proceedings before the International Trade Commission : (“ITC”). ‘ Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers and considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Jawbone’s motion. .
I. BACKGROUND
Jawbone instituted this action on June 10, 2015 against Defendant Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”). Jawbone filed the operative…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- In Re Princo Corporation and Princo America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
3Cited by10 opinions
- Babaria v. BlinkenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Barretto v. JaddouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Cadena v. Nextiva IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Hernandez Gomez v. The GEO Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Hillebrand v. United Parcel Service IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.