Legal Opinion

Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 30, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-02579-HSGPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

Re: Dkt. No. 47

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge

Before the Court is a motion, filed by Plaintiffs Alipheom D/B/A Jawbone and Bodymedia, Inc. (“Jawbone”), to stay this action pending'resolution of proceedings before the International Trade Commission : (“ITC”). ‘ Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers and considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Jawbone’s motion. .

I. BACKGROUND

Jawbone instituted this action on June 10, 2015 against Defendant Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”). Jawbone filed the operative…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. In Re Princo Corporation and Princo America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Babaria v. BlinkenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Barretto v. JaddouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Cadena v. Nextiva IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Hernandez Gomez v. The GEO Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Hillebrand v. United Parcel Service IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API