Legal Opinion

Barretto v. Jaddou

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 10, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04869Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PREETESH CRIJOS BARRETTO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04869-DMR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. STAY 10 UR M. JADDOU, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Preetesh Crijos Barretto and Eunice Ignatius Gonsalves filed this action under 13 the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 501, against Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, 14 Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and Antony 15 Blinken, Secretary of the United States Department of State (“DOS”). Defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Sexton v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  3. Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Gove v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API