Legal Opinion

Cadena v. Nextiva Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 15, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03198Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lavanda Terry, No. CV-24-03298-PHX-DGC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Becton Dickinson and Company, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Danielle Cadena (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Nextiva, Inc., (“Defendant”) 16 filed their Joint Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting Report (Doc. 16) and asked the Court to stay 17 the case until the Court rules on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9). Defendant’s 18 Motion to Dismiss alleges that Plaintiff cannot make out a prima facie case for her claims 19 under the Family Medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Michael R. Wood, Individually and Dba National Photo Services v. Willard W. McEwen Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Van AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API