Legal Opinion

Babaria v. Blinken

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 13, 2023No. 3:22-cv-05521Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JIGAR BABARIA, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05521-SI 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 7 v. STAY PROCEEDINGS 8 ANTONY J. BLINKEN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 9 Defendants. 10 11 Before the Court is the defendants’ motion to stay proceedings pending resolution of 12 plaintiffs’ appeal of this Court’s decision denying their motion for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. 13 No. 23. Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion to stay proceedings. For the reasons discussed 14 below, the motion is GRANTED. 15 16 BACKGROUND1 17 At issue in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LaFleur v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Graham v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Carcieri v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API