Ding v. States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Louie Ding was convicted of conspiring with others to violate Act Cong. May 6, 1882, c. 126, § 11, 22 Slat. 61, as amended by Act July 5, 1884, c. 220, 23 Stat. 117 (Comp. St. 1916, § 4298), by bringing into the United States alien Chinese persons not entitled to be or remain in the United States, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Louie Ding asks reversal of judgment of conviction for conspiring with certain others to violate section 11 of the Act of Congress of May 6, 1882, as amended by Act of July 5, 1884, the purpose being to bring into the state of Washington from British Columbia certain alien Chinese persons not lawfully entitled to1 be or remain in the United States.
William Kirkland was indicted with Ding and Toy and others, but having pleaded guilty was not on trial. The government called Kirkland as a witness, but before he was sworn counsel for the defendant Toy, also on trial, objected…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Knoell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Maxey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Scaffidi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Rendleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. FayDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1927
- Scaffidi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930