Legal Opinion
Rendleman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1927No. 4977PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
On the trial of Rendleman, plaintiff in error, who* was eon * victed of the unlawful possession of morphine, and of having dealt in morphine without having registered or paid a special tax as required by law, the court ruled that Rendleman’s wife was not a competent witness in his behalf. Review of the ruling is sought.
-The case.of Louie Ding v. United States (C. C. A. 1918) 247 F. 12, presented the question of the competency of a witness who did not believe in a Supreme Being who would reward or punish him for his acts in this world. We held that, while under the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Benson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Dowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Tinsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Fay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.