Legal Opinion

Neal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1924No. 6411PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was tried upon an indictment containing two counts. The first charged possession of in toxieating liquor in Indian country, and the second charged a sale of intoxicating liquor to an Osage Indian, contrary to the provisions of the Act of May 25, 1918, § 1, 40 Stat. 563 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 4137aa), Act of July 23, 1892, 27 Stat. 260 (Comp. St. §§ 4136a, 4140), and Act of January 30,1897, 29 Stat. 506 (Comp. St. § 4137). Defendant was convicted and sentenced oh both counts.

At the trial in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Bostic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  3. Bartos v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. United States ex rel. Ulrich v. KelloggCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  5. Elijah McClain and Margie Mae McClain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API