Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. Patterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1887No. 12,728PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover an amount paid, by her to the city as taxes, assessed upon her land, and to enjoin the further collection of taxes theretofore assessed, and, also, to enjoin the further assessment of taxes upon the land. The facts, as shown by the pleadings and the special finding of facts, are, in substance, as follows:

On the 24th day of May, 1860, appellee was the owner in fee simple of eighteen acres of land in one body adjoining the coi’porate limits of the city of Indianapolis. On that day, she and her husband, Samuel J. Patterson, executed and acknowledged, in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. City of Indianapolis v. McAvoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Davidson v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Haynes v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Paul v. Town of WalkertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sedwick v. RitterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Peelle v. State ex rel. HipesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API