Sedwick v. Ritter
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The appellants instituted this action against the appellees to recover real estate, and quiet their title to the same.
*210The sufficiency of the second paragraph of the complaint, to which a demurrer was sustained, presents the only question in the case.
It appears from the complaint that on the 1st day of March, 1867, the plaintiff, James E. Whitesell, was the owner of the southwest quarter of section ten, in township nine north,of range two west; also a part of the northwest quarter of the same section, described by metes and bounds, containing in all two hundred acres; that on the 10th day of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. NourseSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Rosa v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Neal v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Brenner v. QuickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- City of Indianapolis v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Rule v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.